How do we evaluate new source requests for daily.dev?
Submitting a new source to daily.dev is a great way to contribute to our community!
We welcome your requests and promise to give it the proper attention.
What we are looking for?
✅ Relevant and fresh content for developers.
✅ Sources that are generating exciting and professional content.
✅ Sources that publish new content regularly (at least once a week).
✅ Sources that have published a substantial amount of content to date.
✅ Sources about innovative and trending topics that will inspire our community.
✅ Good vibes ✌️
When will we reject a source request?
❌ It is not publishing content for developers.
❌ It is a personal blog (global thought-leaders excluded).
❌ It is used mostly for self-promotion.
❌ It is not publishing content written in English.
❌ It was not active in the past three months or more.
❌ It doesn't provide an RSS feed available for public use.
❌ It is publishing politically-oriented content.
❌ It includes content that is either illegal, pornographic (including mature in content or overtly sexual), racist, sexist (or otherwise offensive), grotesque (or obscene), inflammatory, and other inappropriate content.
Please note that we kindly ask you not to share copyrighted or trademarked sources. If you did not create the source you are submitting for review, make sure it's publicly accessible for sharing. We will give due credit to the owner.
Be respectful to the community
The daily.dev community is highly sensitive to content quality and the code of conduct of publishers. After a new source is approved and added to the daily.dev feed, we continue to monitor it continuously. Our aim is simple -- to maintain and enforce the content guidelines for the benefit of our community.
We kindly ask you to refrain from misusing the opportunity to be featured on the daily.dev feed.
Some legal stuff...